"REAL UNIONISM IS ALL AROUND US"

By Tom Laney
[newdemocracyworld.org]

(Editor's note: The following is taken from flyers that Tom Laney addressed to fellow auto workers in his successful recent election campaign for Unit Committeeman of UAW Local 879 at the St. Paul Ford plant. Regular readers know that New Democracy does not encourage running for union office–Tom himself has long said that "The only thing worse than running for union office is winning"–since we don't believe the unions can be changed. But Tom's campaign was a real inspiration nevertheless. It was based on Tom's passionate belief in his fellow workers–their values, their friendships, their everyday acts of kindness and solidarity–as the real source of all that is good in the union movement. It was based too on Tom's contention that auto workers have to scrap the company UAW and start over, forging ties of solidarity and support across plants and from plant to plant, to build a movement to revolutionize our unions and our society.)

Isn't it time to revolt against all the company unionism that has nearly saturated our plant over the past 10 years? Isn't it time to start acting like a real union again?

The uaw leaders have it all wrong. I am told by past and present uaw reps that like it or not, the new uaw's "reality," the uaw's "real world," is defined by the dog-eat-dog, competitive sections of our contracts. A couple of these guys have told me it's hopeless. But some of these leaders place the blame for the uaw's weakness on us, the general membership, because we don't support our leaders.

This view is wrong. Corporate competitive values—greed, isolation, dog eat dog—will never redefine real unionism. They only define uaw sellouts, uaw company unionism. Adopting the corporate competitive agenda means undermining everything unions stand for. It means racing to the bottom against other autoworkers who ought to be our friends. It means conceding everything the real UAW ever fought for. The extension of this competitive view is that finally, the "winner" of all this dog-eat-dog will have nothing left that's union.

The fact is, most union members still hold the same principles and values that formed unions in the first place. Most people think friendship, solidarity, equality and democracy are the things they value most about their family, social and work lives.

You can prove this by just looking around your job. There are people circulating get-well cards for sick or more likely injured co-workers. There are people welding retirement boxes for folks who are finally getting out. There's someone listening to a friend talk about a family member who's ill and consoling them better than any professional counselor. Women telling racers to slow down and let the foreman worry about the extra work. There's a guy with an arm on a buddy's shoulder who just lost a loved one. A teary-eyed tradesman circulating a card for a worker we lost. Someone showing off pictures of the new baby. There are the heat merchants riding the Packer fans. There's coffee and cakes and pizzas and smorgasbords.

There are the deepest and most profound friendships in which autoworkers share their most difficult times and happiest moments. And there are always people standing up to the boss, taking a friend's side or defending a union right. It has always been this way. It will always be this way because that is the way most people really are. With all our problems and confused company unionists you can still see it all over the place. This is the real union.

These values of friendship and solidarity have taken some hits for sure. These values used to run the shop floor. These values at one time made it nearly impossible for the company to cut out jobs. It is not that way now but it should be.

THE UNION LIVES!

This is where the union is despite 20 years of the most intense work and huge expenditures by the company and the new company uaw to persuade us that we should not be friends but competitors. Not mutual supporters but individuals looking out for ourselves. Not job fighters but doormats. Not extenders of unionism but serfs in the uaw's feudal system.

A long time ago these values of ordinary autoworkers led to the organization of the real UAW. The real UAW cut its teeth on removing wages and working conditions from competition, fighting speedup, running slowdowns, sit-downs and strikes to win contracts that were the envy of workers around the world. Its politics were pro-worker and anti-corporate and were geared up for full-employment economy with good union jobs for everyone.

The new uaw is a sham. It's thrown away the values of workers for corporate values. It is a company union more interested in speeding workers up than slowing them down. Its contracts put local unions into dog-eat-dog competition which divides locals and erodes all the hard-fought gains of other generations. As the uaw moved towards company unionism in the late 70's, union members all over the country fought to retain shop floor unionism, fair job pace and the entire union floor culture that made life on the line much more livable than it is today. The uaw attacked shop floor unionism with favoritism, appointed jobs and fear. Lots of fear. "Do the work or they'll close the plant," we heard often. It attacked seniority because seniority is the cornerstone of shop-floor unionism and shop-floor unionism does not allow speed-up and job cuts. It attacked the generational unity between workers with wage tiers for new hires and cushy jobs—that should go to senior workers or be filled by election—for their friends.

Real unions take the fear out of standing up to powerful, greedy corporations. Strength in numbers, solidarity were the watch words of the real UAW. The new uaw put the fear back in. Speed-up and work injury skyrocketed. Jobs were cut. Plants closed. Work was de-unionized. Strikes were discouraged by insuring that workers who fought back lost.

WHAT CAN WE DO?

The only people who can organize us again are real autoworkers. All the uaw's institutions, the conventions, councils, sub-councils have become lessons in thought control, places where the deal's already done, places where good reps go to be laughed at, ignored, disappointed, disparaged and defeated. We are never going to win there. So where could we win?

To win we need to link the good union folks across our plant on every shift. Everyone would be encouraged if they'd just look for unionism in all the supportive things autoworkers do for each other everyday. That's where the hope is. That's where we can get the confidence we need to act union. Every job fight should be supported. Every good job should be defended. Every bad job placed in the strikable grievance procedure. Every attack by the company, every move by the uaw should be reported to the entire membership.

NO ONE FIGHTS ALONE!

Some years ago, Ricky Brown suggested we put real autoworkers on the road to other plants to talk to other real autoworkers about solidarity. If we came to work one day and saw Edison workers outside our doors asking for help, what would we do? I think most of us would want to help them. They would most likely want to help us. A simple message like, "We are 10 chassis frame-line workers sent here by our co-workers to appeal to you to stop the competition between our plants. We appeal to you for friendship and solidarity. We are here to unite everyone to keep all our plants open. Please help us find a way to do that. We'll be here at the end of your shifts to talk."

This is the way our union was started. It is the way to start a national union conversation about how we can work together again, how we can raise wages for all new hires, stop favoritism, protect union work rules and work pace, and renew the union culture that should run our plant floors. It is the way to step outside the competitive box the uaw/Ford folks put us in. It is the way to give people hope. It is the way to give people confidence in each other. It is the only way to start acting like a union again. It is the way to a society based in friendship and democracy where everyone gets a good job.


Originally published in New Democracy Newsletter, November-December 2000.

Back