From:
John
Spritzler
To:
Graham, William A.
William A. Graham
Dear Dr. Spritzler:
We received your proposal (email) of April 8, 2005. The Dean understands the
importance of discussion and debate on contemporary political problems and
issues. In fact, Middle Eastern political issues are frequently the subjects
of open lectures and panels at Harvard, most prominently under the
sponsorship of the CMES, or the KSG.
You might be interested to know that at the Divinity School, conferences
must be initiated and substantially led by a member of the Divinity School
faculty. The proposing faculty member also must seek the approval of the
dean and others responsible for funding and the academic calendar. We have
a limited number of conferences each year, subject to funding and the
constraints of the calendar, and these conferences are normally planned at
least a year in advance. Our conferences for 2005-6 are already set and
we're beginning to plan for 2006-7.
We regularly receive proposals from scholars outside the school and from our
own students. While we appreciate their thinking of the Divinity School,
we've found it best to insist on internal faculty sponsorship and
concomitant willingness by Divinity School faculty to take on the tasks
necessary to bring a conference to a fruitful conclusion. This policy also
allows us to coordinate topics covered in a year and uses our
resources--both financial and staff--in the most appropriate manner.
Sincerely,
Dean's Office at HDS
*************************************
Dean's Office
Harvard Divinity School
45 Francis Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
deansoffice@hds.harvard.edu
Dear "Dean's Office,"
Thank you for your reply (below) to my email sent to Dean Graham April 8.
I assume from the anonymity of "Dean's Office" that I am communicating with
a person employed by the Dean to reply to emails such as mine with general
all-purpose language, rather than by directly responding to the particular
question posed to the Dean.
But I did ask a very specific question of the Dean and I do desire a reply
to it. I asked the Dean: "My question to you, as the Dean of the Divinity
School, is this: has the Divinity School in the recent past, or does the
Divinity School wish in the near future, to promote a serious discussion of
whether there should be a Jewish state in Palestine, by holding a symposium
on this subject? If so, wonderful! If not, why not?"
Therefore, I would like you to please take this question to the Dean and
obtain a direct answer for me, if you would be so kind. Note that the
question is not whether the School of Divinity has or intends to hold
discussions about (as you phrase it in your email) "Middle Eastern political
issues" or "contemporary political problems" but whether it has or intends
to hold a discussion about a very specific question: Should there be a
Jewish state in Palestine?
I understand from your letter that there are procedures the School employs
to decide what subjects to discuss. This is interesting. But I did not ask
about these procedures. I asked whether the School, by whatever procedure it
chooses, will discuss a particular question.
In your email you note that the School's choice of topics for a conference
depend upon the "willingness by Divinity School faculty to take on the tasks
necessary to bring a conference to a fruitful conclusion." Yes, that is
perfectly understandable. But again, the question is, does this willingness
exist when the topic is the extraordinarily important and controversial
question about the morality of a Jewish state existing in Palestine? And yet
again, it is the Dean who can answer this question, not the "Dean's Office."
I am not asking about policies and procedures of the School. I am asking how
will the School address a controversial moral question, the answer to which
has enormous life and death consequences for millions of people today.
As I explained in my first email, the question "Should there be a Jewish
state in Palestine?" is the question which is at the root of the
Palestine/Israel conflict. Other questions, like "Should Israel occupy the
West Bank?", do not get to the root of the problem because even if Israel
were to end its occupation of the West Bank millions of Palestinians outside
of Israel-proper would still be deprived of their human rights by Israel's
refusal to allow them to return to their country and its refusal to
compensate them for property Israel arbitrarily took from them, and one
million Palestinians living inside Israel would still be denied their right
to the same benefits of Israeli citizenship that Jewish Israeli citizens
enjoy. These denials of Palestinian human rights all stem from the fact that
Israel is a Jewish state (not an "everybody who lives in Israel" state) that
1) cannot tolerate the presence within its borders of non-Jews in numbers
that would threaten Israel's need to have a Jewish majority population no
matter what and 2) cannot treat all its citizens equally because then it
would no longer be a "Jewish state."
For one of the preeminent Schools of Divinity in the world to avoid tackling
this profoundly moral question would be equivalent to a school of divinity
not addressing the question of slavery during the ante-bellum years of our
nation's history -- deplorable. That is why I raise the question to the
Dean. I sincerely hope to receive a direct answer from him, rather than a
"one size fits all" reply from "Dean's Office." Please convey this to him if
you will.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
John Spritzler, Sc.D.
Dear Dr. Spritzler,
As indicated earlier, Dean Graham is aware of your message to him and of
your concerns. Harvard Divinity School does not plan to conduct the kind of
symposium you describe, and does not intend to continue with this exchange.
Sincerely,
Will Joyner
________________________________
Director of Communications
and Editor/Harvard Divinity Bulletin
Harvard Divinity School
45 Francis Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138